Effect of bolting on root yield and qualities of autumn sugar beet cultivars

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Agricultural and Natural Recourses Research and education of Golestan, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Gorgan, Iran

2 Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Gonbad Kavous University

Abstract

One of the significant limitations in autumn cultivation of sugar beet is bolting. To investigate the quantitative and qualitative traits of root sugar beet cultivars and their resistance to bolting, a two-year (2018-2020) experiment was conducted as a randomized complete blocks design with three replications at Varsan Agricultural Research Station of Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Gorgan- Iran. Treatments included commercial autumn sugar beet cultivars [five imported cultivars (Montana, Jerra-kws, Rosagold, Chemineh, and Veles) and a domestic cultivar (Sharif). There was a significant difference in bolting rates of all cultivars in both years. Veles and Sharif cultivars had the highest bolting rate (41.7% and 33.3%) in both years, respectively. The bolting rate was higher in the second than in the first year. There was a significant difference between cultivars for root yield only in 2019. The highest (85.2 t ha-1) and lowest (59.8 t ha-1) root yields were obtained from Jerra-kws Chamine cultivars. There was a significant difference between cultivars for sugar purity, sugar extraction coefficient, and molasses sugar percentage in the second year. There was no significant difference between cultivars for sugar content and harmful nitrogen in both years. The cultivars showed different reactions in terms of bolting rate and other root qualitative traits (pure sugar, extraction coefficient, sodium, potassium, and harmful nitrogen levels) in the two years.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Article Title [Persian]

تأثیر پدیده ساقه روی بر عملکرد و کیفیت ریشه رقم‌های چغندرقند پاییزه

Authors [Persian]

  • نوراله تازیکه 1
  • عباس بیابانی 2
  • علیرضا صابری 1
  • علی راحمی کاریزکی 2
  • معصومه نعیمی 2
1 بخش تحقیقات زراعی و بـاغی مرکـز تحقیقـات و آمـوزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و تـرویج کشـاورزی، گرگان، ایران
2 گروه تولیدات گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه گنبدکاووس، ایران
Abstract [Persian]

 یکی از محدودیت‌های عمده در کشت پاییزه چغندرقند(Beta vulgaris L.) ، ساقه‌روی است. به منظور بررسی ویژگی‌های کمی و کیفی رقم‌های چغندرقند پاییزه و مقاومت آن‌ها به ساقه‌روی، آزمایشی در دو سال‌ ( 99 -1397) در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی ورسن مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش منابع طبیعی، گرگان، ایران. اجرا شد. تیمارها شامل ارقام تجاری چغندرقند پاییزه ]5 رقم خارجی (مونتانا، جراکاواس، روزاگلد، چیمنه و ولس) و رقم داخلی شریف[ بودند. بر اساس نتایج، رقم‌ها از نظر درصد ساقه‌روی در هر دو سال تفاوت معنی‌داری داشتند. در دو سال، رقم ولس و شریف بترتیب بیشترین درصد ساقه‌روی (41/7 و 33/3) را داشتند. درصد ساقه‌روی در سال دوم بیشتر از سال نخست بود. تنها در سال نخست بین رقم‌ها تفاوت معنی‌داری از نظر عملکرد ریشه مشاهده شد. بالاترین (85/2 تن در هکتار) و کمترین عملکرد ریشه بترتیب در رقم های جراکاواس و چمینه بدست آمد. در سال دوم از نظر درصد شکر خالص، ضریب استخراج قند و درصد قند ملاس تفاوت معنی‌داری بین ارقام حاصل گردید. از نظر صفات محتوای قند و نیتروژن مضره در هر دو سال تفاوت معنی‌داری بین ارقام وجود نداشت. ارقام از نظر درصد ساقه‌روی و سایر صفات کیفی ریشه (شکر خالص، ضریب استخراج، سدیم، پتاسیم و نیتروژن مضره) در دو سال واکنش‌های متفاوتی نشان دادند.

Keywords [Persian]

  • درصد قند
  • عملکرد ریشه
  • مقاومت به سرما
  • همبستگی

References

Abdolahian Noghabi, M., Shikholeslami, R., & Babaee, B. (2005). Technical terms of sugar beet quantity and quality. Journal of Sugar Beet, 21(1), 101-104. doi: 10.22092/jsb.2005.8201.
Abdollahian–Noghabi, M. (2008). A review on growth and production of sugar beet crops in Iran during the recent years. Sugar Beet Journal, 23(2), 198-197. DOI.org/10.22092/jsb.2007.1660.
Abdollahian-Noghabi, M., Shaikholeslami, R., & Babaei, B. (2005). Technical terms of sugar beet yield and quality. Sugar Beet Journal, 21(1), 101-104. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2005.8201.
Behzad, R., Behzad, K., Mazaheri Tehrani, M., & Shahidi Noghabi, M. (2010). Performance of size of sugar beets stored in silo on sodium and potassium changes. Iranian Food Science and Technology Research Journal, 6 (2), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.22067/ifstrj.v6i2.7813
Bloch, D., Hoffmann, C. M., & Marlander, B. (2006). Solute accumulation as a cause for quality losses in sugar beet submitted to continuous and temporary drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science , 192, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00185.x.
Cook, D. A., & Scott, R. K. (1993). Sugar beet crop: Principle and practical.. London: Chapman and Hall.
Curcic, Z., Ciric, M., Nagl. N., & Taski-Ajdukovic, K. (2018). Effect of sugar beet genotype, planting and harvesting dates and their interaction on sugar yield. frontiers in plant science. Frontiers in Plant Science Journal, 9, 1-9.
Farahmand, Kh., Faramarzi, M. A., & Moharramzadeh, M. (2013). Possibility of autumn sugar beet planting in Moghan region. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Breeding Journal, 9 (3), 45-55.
Fazel, M., Azimi, M. R., Ahmadi, M., Hamidi, H., & Armin, M. (2022). Evaluation of the production capacity and quantitative and qualitative yield of sugar beet genotypes in winter cultivationin Khorasan Razavi province. Journal of Sugar Beet, 38(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.22092/JSB.2022.356754.1293.
Hamidi, H., Ahmadi, M., & Taleghani, D. F. (2022). Selection of suitable sugar beet genotypes for winter sowing (Pending) in Torbat-e-Jam Region. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 20(3), 335-348. DOI: 10.22067/jcesc.2022.74787.1138.
Hasanvandi, M. S., Hosseinpour, M., Rajabi, A.,  Mahmoudi, S. B., Taleghani, D., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., & Parmoon, Gh.  (2022).  Evaluation of New Autumn Sown Sugar Beet Cultivars for  Quantitative and Qualitative Traits in Khuzestan Province. Journal of Crops Improvement, 24 (4), 1117-1132. DOI: http://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2022.329580.2606
Hoffmann, C. M., & Kluge-Severin, S. (2011). Growth analysis of autumn and spring sown sugar beet. European Journal Agronomy, 34(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.09.001.
Hoffmann, C. M., & Marlander, B. (2005). Composition of harmful nitrogen in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) amino acids, betaine, nitrates affected by genotype and environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 22(3), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.03.003.
Hoffmann, C. M., Huijbregts, T., van Swaaij, N., & Jansen, R. (2009.) Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes. European Journal of Agronomy, 30 (1), 17-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.06.004.
Hoseinzadeh Fazl M., Taleghani DF., Habibim, D., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., & Ardakanim, MR. (2020) Assessment of possibility of autumn planting of sugar beet in Alborz province in Iran. Seed Plant Journal,36(1):87-104.https://doi.org/10.22092/sppi.2020.122889
Hosseini, L., Maleki, A., Mozafari, A., Mirzaeiheydari, M., & Sadeghi-Shoae, M. (2021). Evaluation of water and nitrogen use efficiency, digestibility and some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of forage beet cultivars under different irrigation methods and nitrogen levels. Journal of Crop Health, 74, 177–191 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-021-00601-2.
Hosseinian, S. H., Abdullahian-Noghabi, M., Majnon-Hoseini, N., & Babaei, B. (2019). Quantitative and qualitative traits of autumn sugar beet cultivars in Dezful region in two cropping years. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 11 (37), 144-152. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20085958.1398.11.37.14.6
Hosseinian, S. H., Abdullah-Noghab,i M., & Majnon-Hoseini, N. (2014). The effect of bolting phenomenon on yield and quality of two sugar beet cultivars in autumn cultivation in Dezful region. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 16(4), 265-277 (In Persian). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625540.1393.16.4.1.2
Jaggard, K. W., Qi, A., & Ober, E. S. (2009). Capture and use of solar radiation, water, and nitrogen by sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Experimental Botany. 60(7), 1919-1925. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp110.
Jahani Moghadam, A., Parsa, S., Mahmoudi, S., &  Ahmadi, M .(2017). Evaluation of the effects of planting date and cultivar on yield and bolting on sugar beet cultivars under autumn planting conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, 13 (2), 43-57.
Kirchhoff, M., Trankner, C., Kopiseh-Obuch, F., & Jung, Ch. (2009). Selection for cold hardiness and late bolting for breeding winter beets. Raumberg-Gumpenstein, Irdning, Austria, 37, 173-175
Kunz, M. (2004). Sugar analysis. Beet. The international commission for uniform methods of sugar analysis (ICUMSA). General Subject, 6, 110-117.
Kunz, M., Martin, D., & Puke, H. (2002). Precision of beet analyses in Germany explained for polarization. Zuckerindustrie,127, 13-21.
Mall, A. K., Misra, V., Pathak, A. D., & Srivastava, S. (2021). Sugar beet cultivation in India: Prospects for bio-ethanol production and valueadded co-products. Sugar Tech, 23,1218–1234. DOI: 10.1007/s12355-021-01007-0
Milford, G. F. J., Jarvis, P. J., & Walters, C. (2010). A vernalization intensity model to predict bolting in sugar Beet. Journal of Agricultural Science,148, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859609990323
Mohamad Yousefi, S., Najafi Zari, H., & Ahmadi, M. (2016). Study of genetic diversity of sugar beet genotypes for bolting resistance and morphophysiological traits. Journal of Agriculture (Research and Construction), 29(2), 55-65 https://doi.org/10.22092/aj.2016.109592
Mohammadian, R. (2016). Effect of sowing date and defoliation intensity on root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 18 (2):88-103. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625540.1395.18.2.1.2
Nasri, R., Kashani, A., Paknejad, F., Sadeghi-Shoa, M., & Ghorban, S. (2012). Correlation and path analysis of qualitative and quantitative yield in sugar beet in transplant and direct cultivation method in saline lands. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, 8 (1), 213-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jcb.13.37.197
Oroojnia, S., Habibi, D., Taleghani, D. F, Safari Dolatabadi, S,. Pazaki, A.R., Moaveni, P., Rahmani, M., & Farshidi, M. (2012). Evaluation of yield and yield components of different sugar beet genotypes under drought stress conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, 8 (10), 1-18.
Pacuta, V., Rasovsky, M., Michalska-Klimczak, B., Wyszyˇnski, Z. (2021) Grain yield and quality traits of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) treated with seaweed- and humic acid-based biostimulants. Journal Agronomy, 11(7), 1-15 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071270
Pfeiffer, N., Moller, A., Jung, Ch., & Kopisch, F. (2013). Genetic and phenotypic characterization of bolting failure in sugar beet. Plant and animal genome Conference, San Drege CA.
Refay, Y. A. (2010). Root yield and quality traits of three sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) varieties in  relation to sowing date and stand densities. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(5), 589-5941. ISSN 1817-3047
Sadeghian, S. Y. (2014). Bolting in sugar beet, genetics and physiological aspects. University of Sweden. Ph.D. Thesis. Agricultural Science. Plant Breeding Department, P124
Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S, Shirzadi MH. Aghaeezadeh M. Taleghani D, Javaheri MA, Aliasghari A. )2012). Evaluation of sowing and harvesting date effects on yield and quality of five sugar beet cultivars in Jiroft region (autumn planting). Journal of Sugar Beet. 28(1): 42-25. https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2012.659
Sadeghzadeh hemayati, S., Shirzadi, M. H., Aghaeizadeh, M., Taleghani, D., Javaheri, M A., & Aliasgari, A. (2012). Evaluation of sowing and harvesting date effects on yield and quality of five sugar beet cultivars in Jiroft region (autumn planting). Journal Sugar Beet, 28 (1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2012.659.
Vafadar, L., Ebadi, A., & Sajed, K. (2008). Effects of sowing date and plant density on yield and some traits of sugar beet genotypes. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 1(2), 103-120و https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2008739.1387.1.2.7.0.
Iran Agricultural Research
Volume 42, Issue 1
June 2023
Pages 99-107

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics