An appropriate method to determine the interaction type of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and Bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV)

Document Type : Full Article

Authors

1 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz I. R. Iran

2 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering, College of Agriculture, and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, I.R. Iran

Abstract

The occurrence of viral co-infection is a common phenomenon in cultivated and native plant species and can alter the dynamics of virus infection. In this study, disease progress was examined in single and mixed infections of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and Bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) by measuring the rate of symptom development, disease severity and area under disease progress curve on infected bean and broad bean. Simultaneous infection of bean to CMV and BYMV caused higher disease severity; however, no significant differences in disease severity were found on broad bean. In this study, a novel statistical approach (Abbott's approach) was used to recognize virus joint action in bean and broad bean hosts. Abbott's approach indicated synergistic effect between CMV and BYMV on bean only while the interaction was antagonistic when growth responses were considered on the same host. In broad bean plants inoculated with CMV+BYMV, CMV and BYMV, the two viruses affected disease severity and growth responses in an additive manner. Taken together, Abbott's approach was an appropriate method to determine synergistic interaction in these pathosystems.

Keywords


Article Title [Persian]

روشی مناسب برای تعیین نوع برهمکنش ویروس موزائیک خیار و ویروس موزائیک زرد لوبیا

Authors [Persian]

  • امین اله طهماسبی 1
  • حبیب اله حمزه زرقانی 1
  • علیرضا افشاریفر 1
  • اکبر دیزجی 2
1 گروه گیاهپزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شیراز- شیراز- ج. ا. ایران
2 گروه گیاهپزشکی ، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ج. ا. ایران
Abstract [Persian]

وقوع آلودگی همزمان پدیده­ای رایج در گونه­های گیاهی است که می­تواند منجر به تغییرات در آلودگی ویروس­ها شود. در این مطالعه، پیشرفت بیماری در آلودگی­های مخلوط و انفرادی ویروس موزائیک خیار و ویروس موزائیک زرد لوبیا توسط اندازه­گیری گسترش علائم، شدت بیماری و سطح زیر منحنی پیشرفت بیماری در لوبیا و باقلا بررسی شد. آلودگی همزمان لوبیا به ویروس موزائیک خیار و ویروس موزائیک زرد لوبیا، شدت بیماری بالاتر میزبان را باعث شد، اما تفاوت معنی داری در باقلا مشاهده نشد. روش Abbottاثر هم افزایی در لوبیا بین ویروس موزائیک خیار و ویروس موزائیک زرد لوبیا نشان داد، در حالی که بر پایه پاسخ­های رشدی میزبان، برهمکنش از نوع آنتاگونیست بود. در باقلا، روش Abbott و پاسخ­های رشدی میزبان، برهمکنش ویروس‌ها را از نوع افزایشی نشان داد. به طور کلی، روش Abbott روشی مناسب برای تعیین نوع برهمکنش از نوع هم افزایی در این پاتوسیستم­ها بود.

Keywords [Persian]

  • آلودگی مخلوط
  • پاسخ‌های رشدی
  • روش Abbott
  • ویروس موزائیک خیار
  • ویروس موزائیک زرد لوبیا
Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18(2), 265-267.
Anonymous (1999). SAS Institute Inc: SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 8. USA.
Cedergreen, N. (2014). Quantifying synergy: a systematic review of mixture toxicity studies within environmental toxicology. PloS one, 9(5), e96580.
Clark, M. F., & Adams, A. N. (1977). Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology, 34, 475–483.
Ding, S. W., Anderson, B. J., Haase, H. R., & Symons, R. H. (1994). New overlapping gene encoded by the Cucumber mosaic virus genome. Virology, 198, 593–601.
Duncan, D. B. (1951). A significance test for differences between ranked treatments in an analysis of variance. Virginia Journal of Science, 2, 171–189.
García-Cano, E., Resende, R. O., Fernández-Muñoz, R., & Moriones, E. (2006). Synergistic interaction between Tomato chlorosis virus and Tomato spotted wilt virus results in breakdown of resistance in tomato. Phytopathology, 96, 1263–1269.
Hacker, D. L., & Fowler, B. C. (2000). Complementation of the host range restriction of Southern cowpea mosaic virus in bean by Southern bean mosaic virus. Virology, 266, 140–149.
Hemida, S. K. (2005). Effect of Bean yellow mosaic virus on physiological parameters of Vicia faba and Phaseolus vulgaris. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 7 (2), 154–157.
Hull, R. (2014). Plant Virology (5th Ed). USA, San Diego: Academic Press.
Kim, M. S., Kim, M. J., Hong, J. S., Choi, J. K., & Ryu, K. H. (2010). Patterns in disease progress and the influence of single and multiple viral infections on pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) growth. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 127, 53–61. 
Kosman, E., & Cohen, Y. (1996). Procedures for calculating and differentiating synergism and antagonism in action of fungicide mixtures. Phytopathology, 86 (11), 1263–1272.
Lidsky, P. V., Romanova, L. I., Kolesnikova, M. S., Bardina, M. V., Khitrina, E. V., Hato, S. V., van Kuppeveld, F. J. M., & Agol, V. I. (2009). Interactions between viral and prokaryotic pathogens in a mixed infection with Cardiovirus and Mycoplasma. Journal of Virology, 83, 9940–9951.     
Madden, L. V., Hughes, G., & van den Bosch, F. (2007). The study of plant diseases epidemics. USA, Minnesota: APS Press
Malapi-Nelson, M., Wen, R. H., Ownley, B. H., & Hajimorad, M. R. (2009). Co-infection of soybean with Soybean mosaic virus and Alfalfa mosaic virus results in disease synergism and alteration in accumulation level of both viruses. Plant Disease, 93, 1259–1264.
Martin, S., & Elena, S. F. (2009). Application of game theory to the interaction between plant viruses during mixed infections. Journal of General Virology, 90, 2815–2820.
Morse, P. M. (1978). Some comments on the assessment of joint action in herbicide mixtures. Weed Science, 26(1), 58-71.
Murphy, J. F., & Bowen, K. L. (2006). Synergistic disease in pepper caused by the mixed infection of Cucumber mosaic virus and Pepper mottle virus. Phytopathology, 96, 240–247.
Pagan, I., Alonso-Blanco, C., & Garcı´a-Arenal, F. (2007). The relationship of within-host multiplication and virulence in a plant virus system. PLoS One, 2(8), e786.
Palukaitis, P., Roossinck, M. J., Dietzgen, R. G., & Francki, R. I. B. (1992). Cucumber mosaic virus. Advances in Virus Research, 41, 281–348.
Rentera-Canett, I., Xoconostle-Cázares, B., Ruiz-Medrano, R., & Rivera-Bustamante, R. F. (2011). Geminivirus mixed infection on pepper plants: Synergistic interaction between PHYVV and PepGMV. Virology Journal, 8, 104. 
Revers, F., Le Gall, O. T., Candresse, T., & Maule, A. J. (1999). New advances in understanding the molecular biology of plant/potyvirus interactions. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interaction, 12, 367–376.
Sánchez -Navarro, J. A., Herranz, M. C., & Pallás, V. (2006). Cell-to-cell movement of Alfalfa mosaic virus can be mediated by the movement proteins of Ilar -, Bromo -, Cucumo -, Tobamo - and Comoviruses and does not require virion formation. Virology, 346, 66–73.
Shah, D. A., Dillard, H. R., Mazumdar-Leighton, S., Gonsalves, D., & Nault, B. A. (2006). Incidence, spatial patterns, and associations among viruses in snap bean and alfalfa in New York. Plant Disease, 90, 203–210.
Shaner, E., & Finney, R. E. (1977). The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. Phytopathology, 67, 1051–1056.
Shellie-Dessert, K. C., & Bliss, F. A. (1991). Genetic improvement in food quality factors. In van Schoonhoven, A. & Voysest, O. (Eds.), Common Beans. Research for Crop Improvement.(pp. 649–671). Wallingford: CAB International.
Syller, J. (2016). Antagonistic within‐host interactions between plant viruses: molecular basis and impact on viral and host fitness. Molecular plant pathology, 17(5), 769-782. 
Tahmasebi, A., Dizadji, A., & KoohiHabibi, M. (2013). Interaction of Cucumber mosaic virus and Bean yellow mosaic virus in co-infected plants of bean and broadbean. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 46(9), 1081–1092.
Tahmasebi, A., Dizadji, A., & KoohiHabibi, M. (2010). Infection status of bean farms of four provinces in Iran to Cucumber mosaic virus, Bean yellow mosaic virus and their mix infection, 19th Iranian Plant Protection Congress (p. 710), Tehran, Iran. 
Taiwo, M. A., Kareem, K. T., Nsa, I. Y., & Hughes, J. D. A. (2007). Cowpea viruses: Effect of single and mixed infections on symptomatology and virus concentration. Virology Journal, 4(1), 95.
Taylor, A. G., & Shail, J. W. (2006). The impact of CMV in reducing yield of selected snap bean cultivars. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative, 49, 199–200.
Wadley, F. M. (1945). The evidence required to show synergistic action of insecticides and a short cut in analysis. US Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine.
Wintermantel, W. M. (2005). Co-infection of Beet mosaic virus with beet yellowing viruses leads to increased symptom expression on sugar beet. Plant Disease, 89, 325–331.
Wintermantel, W. M., Cortez, A. A., Anchieta, A. G., Gulati- Sakhuja, A., & Hladky, L. L. (2008). Co-infection by two criniviruses alters accumulation of each virus in a host-specific manner and influences efficiency of virus transmission. Phytopathology, 98, 1340–1345.